BLASTP 2.2.26 [Sep-21-2011]
Reference: Altschul, Stephen F., Thomas L. Madden, Alejandro A. Schaffer,
Jinghui Zhang, Zheng Zhang, Webb Miller, and David J. Lipman (1997),
"Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search
programs", Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3389-3402.
Reference for compositional score matrix adjustment: Altschul, Stephen F.,
John C. Wootton, E. Michael Gertz, Richa Agarwala, Aleksandr Morgulis,
Alejandro A. Schaffer, and Yi-Kuo Yu (2005) "Protein database searches
using compositionally adjusted substitution matrices", FEBS J. 272:5101-5109.
Query= 023588
(280 letters)
Database: pdbaa
62,578 sequences; 14,973,337 total letters
Searching..................................................done
>pdb|1GAT|A Chain A, Solution Structure Of The Specific Dna Complex Of The Zinc
Containing Dna Binding Domain Of The Erythroid
Transcription Factor Gata-1 By Multidimensional Nmr
pdb|1GAU|A Chain A, Solution Structure Of The Specific Dna Complex Of The Zinc
Containing Dna Binding Domain Of The Erythroid
Transcription Factor Gata-1 By Multidimensional Nmr
Length = 60
Score = 35.0 bits (79), Expect = 0.048, Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
Identities = 14/31 (45%), Positives = 20/31 (64%), Gaps = 1/31 (3%)
Query: 213 CMHCEVAETPQWREGPMGPKTLCNACGVRYR 243
C +C+ + T WR PMG +CNACG+ Y+
Sbjct: 7 CSNCQTSTTTLWRRSPMGDP-VCNACGLYYK 36
>pdb|3GAT|A Chain A, Solution Nmr Structure Of The C-Terminal Domain Of Chicken
Gata-1 Bound To Dna, 34 Structures
pdb|2GAT|A Chain A, Solution Structure Of The C-Terminal Domain Of Chicken
Gata- 1 Bound To Dna, Nmr, Regularized Mean Structure
Length = 66
Score = 35.0 bits (79), Expect = 0.051, Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
Identities = 14/31 (45%), Positives = 20/31 (64%), Gaps = 1/31 (3%)
Query: 213 CMHCEVAETPQWREGPMGPKTLCNACGVRYR 243
C +C+ + T WR PMG +CNACG+ Y+
Sbjct: 7 CSNCQTSTTTLWRRSPMGD-PVCNACGLYYK 36
>pdb|2L6Y|A Chain A, Haddock Model Of Gata1nf:lmo2lim2-Ldb1lid
pdb|2L6Z|A Chain A, Haddock Model Of Gata1nf:lmo2lim2-Ldb1lid With Fog
Length = 39
Score = 34.3 bits (77), Expect = 0.075, Method: Composition-based stats.
Identities = 14/33 (42%), Positives = 20/33 (60%), Gaps = 1/33 (3%)
Query: 211 RKCMHCEVAETPQWREGPMGPKTLCNACGVRYR 243
R+C++C TP WR G LCNACG+ ++
Sbjct: 3 RECVNCGATATPLWRRDRTG-HYLCNACGLYHK 34
>pdb|1GNF|A Chain A, Solution Structure Of The N-Terminal Zinc Finger Of Murine
Gata-1, Nmr, 25 Structures
Length = 46
Score = 34.3 bits (77), Expect = 0.088, Method: Composition-based stats.
Identities = 14/33 (42%), Positives = 20/33 (60%), Gaps = 1/33 (3%)
Query: 211 RKCMHCEVAETPQWREGPMGPKTLCNACGVRYR 243
R+C++C TP WR G LCNACG+ ++
Sbjct: 5 RECVNCGATATPLWRRDRTG-HYLCNACGLYHK 36
>pdb|1Y0J|A Chain A, Zinc Fingers As Protein Recognition Motifs: Structural
Basis For The Gata-1FRIEND OF GATA INTERACTION
Length = 46
Score = 33.9 bits (76), Expect = 0.097, Method: Composition-based stats.
Identities = 14/33 (42%), Positives = 20/33 (60%), Gaps = 1/33 (3%)
Query: 211 RKCMHCEVAETPQWREGPMGPKTLCNACGVRYR 243
R+C++C TP WR G LCNACG+ ++
Sbjct: 5 RECVNCGATATPLWRRDRTG-HYLCNACGLYHK 36
>pdb|4GAT|A Chain A, Solution Nmr Structure Of The Wild Type Dna Binding Domain
Of Area Complexed To A 13bp Dna Containing A Cgata Site,
Regularized Mean Structure
pdb|5GAT|A Chain A, Solution Nmr Structure Of The Wild Type Dna Binding Domain
Of Area Complexed To A 13bp Dna Containing A Cgata Site,
35 Structures
Length = 66
Score = 33.9 bits (76), Expect = 0.098, Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
Identities = 15/35 (42%), Positives = 20/35 (57%), Gaps = 1/35 (2%)
Query: 206 QTDTPRKCMHCEVAETPQWREGPMGPKTLCNACGV 240
+ + P C +C TP WR P G + LCNACG+
Sbjct: 5 EQNGPTTCTNCFTQTTPLWRRNPEG-QPLCNACGL 38
>pdb|7GAT|A Chain A, Solution Nmr Structure Of The L22v Mutant Dna Binding
Domain Of Area Complexed To A 13 Bp Dna Containing A
Tgata Site, 34 Structures
pdb|6GAT|A Chain A, Solution Nmr Structure Of The L22v Mutant Dna Binding
Domain Of Area Complexed To A 13 Bp Dna Containing A
Tgata Site, Regularized Mean Structure
Length = 66
Score = 33.9 bits (76), Expect = 0.11, Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
Identities = 15/35 (42%), Positives = 20/35 (57%), Gaps = 1/35 (2%)
Query: 206 QTDTPRKCMHCEVAETPQWREGPMGPKTLCNACGV 240
+ + P C +C TP WR P G + LCNACG+
Sbjct: 5 EQNGPTTCTNCFTQTTPVWRRNPEG-QPLCNACGL 38
>pdb|3VD6|C Chain C, Both Zn Fingers Of Gata1 Bound To Palindromic Dna
Recognition Site, P21 Crystal Form
pdb|3VEK|C Chain C, Both Zn Fingers Of Gata1 Bound To Palindromic Dna
Recognition Site, P1 Crystal Form
pdb|3VEK|F Chain F, Both Zn Fingers Of Gata1 Bound To Palindromic Dna
Recognition Site, P1 Crystal Form
Length = 119
Score = 32.7 bits (73), Expect = 0.20, Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
Identities = 18/44 (40%), Positives = 26/44 (59%), Gaps = 2/44 (4%)
Query: 211 RKCMHCEVAETPQWREGPMGPKTLCNACGVRYR-SGRLVPEYRP 253
R+C++C TP WR G LCNACG+ ++ +G+ P RP
Sbjct: 3 RECVNCGATATPLWRRDRTG-HYLCNACGLYHKMNGQNRPLIRP 45
>pdb|2VUS|I Chain I, Crystal Structure Of Unliganded Nmra-Area Zinc Finger
Complex
pdb|2VUS|J Chain J, Crystal Structure Of Unliganded Nmra-Area Zinc Finger
Complex
pdb|2VUS|K Chain K, Crystal Structure Of Unliganded Nmra-Area Zinc Finger
Complex
pdb|2VUS|L Chain L, Crystal Structure Of Unliganded Nmra-Area Zinc Finger
Complex
pdb|2VUS|M Chain M, Crystal Structure Of Unliganded Nmra-Area Zinc Finger
Complex
pdb|2VUS|N Chain N, Crystal Structure Of Unliganded Nmra-Area Zinc Finger
Complex
pdb|2VUS|O Chain O, Crystal Structure Of Unliganded Nmra-Area Zinc Finger
Complex
pdb|2VUS|P Chain P, Crystal Structure Of Unliganded Nmra-Area Zinc Finger
Complex
pdb|2VUT|I Chain I, Crystal Structure Of Nad-Bound Nmra-Area Zinc Finger
Complex
pdb|2VUT|J Chain J, Crystal Structure Of Nad-Bound Nmra-Area Zinc Finger
Complex
pdb|2VUT|K Chain K, Crystal Structure Of Nad-Bound Nmra-Area Zinc Finger
Complex
pdb|2VUT|L Chain L, Crystal Structure Of Nad-Bound Nmra-Area Zinc Finger
Complex
pdb|2VUT|M Chain M, Crystal Structure Of Nad-Bound Nmra-Area Zinc Finger
Complex
pdb|2VUT|N Chain N, Crystal Structure Of Nad-Bound Nmra-Area Zinc Finger
Complex
pdb|2VUT|O Chain O, Crystal Structure Of Nad-Bound Nmra-Area Zinc Finger
Complex
pdb|2VUT|P Chain P, Crystal Structure Of Nad-Bound Nmra-Area Zinc Finger
Complex
pdb|2VUU|I Chain I, Crystal Structure Of Nadp-Bound Nmra-Area Zinc Finger
Complex
pdb|2VUU|J Chain J, Crystal Structure Of Nadp-Bound Nmra-Area Zinc Finger
Complex
pdb|2VUU|K Chain K, Crystal Structure Of Nadp-Bound Nmra-Area Zinc Finger
Complex
pdb|2VUU|L Chain L, Crystal Structure Of Nadp-Bound Nmra-Area Zinc Finger
Complex
pdb|2VUU|M Chain M, Crystal Structure Of Nadp-Bound Nmra-Area Zinc Finger
Complex
pdb|2VUU|N Chain N, Crystal Structure Of Nadp-Bound Nmra-Area Zinc Finger
Complex
pdb|2VUU|O Chain O, Crystal Structure Of Nadp-Bound Nmra-Area Zinc Finger
Complex
pdb|2VUU|P Chain P, Crystal Structure Of Nadp-Bound Nmra-Area Zinc Finger
Complex
Length = 43
Score = 32.7 bits (73), Expect = 0.20, Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
Identities = 15/31 (48%), Positives = 18/31 (58%), Gaps = 1/31 (3%)
Query: 210 PRKCMHCEVAETPQWREGPMGPKTLCNACGV 240
P C +C TP WR P G + LCNACG+
Sbjct: 1 PTTCTNCFTQTTPLWRRNPEG-QPLCNACGL 30
>pdb|4HC7|A Chain A, Crystal Structure Of The Full Dna Binding Domain Of
Gata3-Complex 2
pdb|4HC7|B Chain B, Crystal Structure Of The Full Dna Binding Domain Of
Gata3-Complex 2
pdb|4HC9|A Chain A, Dna Binding By Gata Transcription Factor-Complex 3
pdb|4HCA|A Chain A, Dna Binding By Gata Transcription Factor-Complex 1
Length = 115
Score = 32.3 bits (72), Expect = 0.28, Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
Identities = 17/47 (36%), Positives = 25/47 (53%), Gaps = 4/47 (8%)
Query: 211 RKCMHCEVAETPQWREGPMGPKTLCNACGVRYRSGRLVPEYRPAASP 257
R+C++C TP WR G LCNACG+ + ++ + RP P
Sbjct: 6 RECVNCGATSTPLWRRDGTG-HYLCNACGLYH---KMNGQNRPLIKP 48
Score = 28.1 bits (61), Expect = 6.0, Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
Identities = 12/31 (38%), Positives = 17/31 (54%), Gaps = 1/31 (3%)
Query: 213 CMHCEVAETPQWREGPMGPKTLCNACGVRYR 243
C +C+ T WR G +CNACG+ Y+
Sbjct: 62 CANCQTTTTTLWRRNANGDP-VCNACGLYYK 91
>pdb|2KAE|A Chain A, Data-Driven Model Of Med1:dna Complex
Length = 71
Score = 30.4 bits (67), Expect = 1.1, Method: Composition-based stats.
Identities = 20/49 (40%), Positives = 23/49 (46%), Gaps = 8/49 (16%)
Query: 195 GSRENKKLSFQQTDTPRKCMHCEVAETPQWREGPMGPKTLCNACGVRYR 243
GS NKK SFQ C +C V ET +WR CNAC + R
Sbjct: 1 GSHMNKK-SFQ-------CSNCSVTETIRWRNIRSKEGIQCNACFIYQR 41
>pdb|3DFV|D Chain D, Adjacent Gata Dna Binding
pdb|3DFV|C Chain C, Adjacent Gata Dna Binding
pdb|3DFX|A Chain A, Opposite Gata Dna Binding
pdb|3DFX|B Chain B, Opposite Gata Dna Binding
Length = 63
Score = 29.6 bits (65), Expect = 2.2, Method: Composition-based stats.
Identities = 12/31 (38%), Positives = 17/31 (54%), Gaps = 1/31 (3%)
Query: 213 CMHCEVAETPQWREGPMGPKTLCNACGVRYR 243
C +C+ T WR G +CNACG+ Y+
Sbjct: 10 CANCQTTTTTLWRRNANG-DPVCNACGLYYK 39
Database: pdbaa
Posted date: Mar 3, 2013 10:34 PM
Number of letters in database: 14,973,337
Number of sequences in database: 62,578
Lambda K H
0.316 0.132 0.410
Lambda K H
0.267 0.0410 0.140
Matrix: BLOSUM62
Gap Penalties: Existence: 11, Extension: 1
Number of Hits to DB: 8,159,739
Number of Sequences: 62578
Number of extensions: 303470
Number of successful extensions: 492
Number of sequences better than 100.0: 12
Number of HSP's better than 100.0 without gapping: 1
Number of HSP's successfully gapped in prelim test: 11
Number of HSP's that attempted gapping in prelim test: 482
Number of HSP's gapped (non-prelim): 14
length of query: 280
length of database: 14,973,337
effective HSP length: 98
effective length of query: 182
effective length of database: 8,840,693
effective search space: 1609006126
effective search space used: 1609006126
T: 11
A: 40
X1: 16 ( 7.3 bits)
X2: 38 (14.6 bits)
X3: 64 (24.7 bits)
S1: 41 (21.6 bits)
S2: 51 (24.3 bits)