BLASTP 2.2.26 [Sep-21-2011]


Reference: Altschul, Stephen F., Thomas L. Madden, Alejandro A. Schaffer, 
Jinghui Zhang, Zheng Zhang, Webb Miller, and David J. Lipman (1997), 
"Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search
programs",  Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3389-3402.


Reference for compositional score matrix adjustment: Altschul, Stephen F., 
John C. Wootton, E. Michael Gertz, Richa Agarwala, Aleksandr Morgulis,
Alejandro A. Schaffer, and Yi-Kuo Yu (2005) "Protein database searches
using compositionally adjusted substitution matrices", FEBS J. 272:5101-5109.

Query= 029740
         (189 letters)

Database: pdbaa 
           62,578 sequences; 14,973,337 total letters

Searching..................................................done



>pdb|2BHW|A Chain A, Pea Light-Harvesting Complex Ii At 2.5 Angstrom Resolution
 pdb|2BHW|B Chain B, Pea Light-Harvesting Complex Ii At 2.5 Angstrom Resolution
 pdb|2BHW|C Chain C, Pea Light-Harvesting Complex Ii At 2.5 Angstrom Resolution
          Length = 232

 Score =  160 bits (405), Expect = 4e-40,   Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
 Identities = 88/176 (50%), Positives = 118/176 (67%), Gaps = 8/176 (4%)

Query: 7   VSARNQTTSASIYQAYELIHARWAMLGAAGFIIPEAFNKFGANCGPEAVWFKTGALLLDG 66
           +SA  +T S +  +  E+IH+RWAMLGA G + PE  ++ G   G EAVWFK G+ +   
Sbjct: 51  LSADPETFSKN--RELEVIHSRWAMLGALGSVFPELLSRNGVKFG-EAVWFKAGSQIFSE 107

Query: 67  NTLNYFGKN--IPINLVFAVIA-EIVLVGGAEYYRITNGL--DLEDKLHPGGPFDPLGLA 121
             L+Y G    +    + A+ A +++L+G  E YRI  G   ++ D L+PGG FDPLGLA
Sbjct: 108 GGLDYLGNPSLVHAQSILAIWATQVILMGAVEGYRIAGGPLGEVVDPLYPGGSFDPLGLA 167

Query: 122 KDPDQFALLKVKEIKNGRLAMFAMLGFFLQAYVTGEGPVENLAKHLSDPFANNLLT 177
            DP+ FA LKVKE+KNGRLAMF+M GFF+QA VTG+GP+ENLA HL+DP  NN  +
Sbjct: 168 DDPEAFAELKVKELKNGRLAMFSMFGFFVQAIVTGKGPLENLADHLADPVNNNAWS 223


>pdb|1VCR|A Chain A, An Icosahedral Assembly Of Light-Harvesting Chlorophyll AB
           Protein Complex From Pea Thylakoid Membranes
          Length = 232

 Score =  160 bits (405), Expect = 4e-40,   Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
 Identities = 88/176 (50%), Positives = 118/176 (67%), Gaps = 8/176 (4%)

Query: 7   VSARNQTTSASIYQAYELIHARWAMLGAAGFIIPEAFNKFGANCGPEAVWFKTGALLLDG 66
           +SA  +T S +  +  E+IH+RWAMLGA G + PE  ++ G   G EAVWFK G+ +   
Sbjct: 51  LSADPETFSKN--RELEVIHSRWAMLGALGCVFPELLSRNGVKFG-EAVWFKAGSQIFSE 107

Query: 67  NTLNYFGKN--IPINLVFAVIA-EIVLVGGAEYYRITNGL--DLEDKLHPGGPFDPLGLA 121
             L+Y G    +    + A+ A +++L+G  E YRI  G   ++ D L+PGG FDPLGLA
Sbjct: 108 GGLDYLGNPSLVHAQSILAIWATQVILMGAVEGYRIAGGPLGEVVDPLYPGGSFDPLGLA 167

Query: 122 KDPDQFALLKVKEIKNGRLAMFAMLGFFLQAYVTGEGPVENLAKHLSDPFANNLLT 177
            DP+ FA LKVKE+KNGRLAMF+M GFF+QA VTG+GP+ENLA HL+DP  NN  +
Sbjct: 168 DDPEAFAELKVKELKNGRLAMFSMFGFFVQAIVTGKGPLENLADHLADPVNNNAWS 223


>pdb|1RWT|A Chain A, Crystal Structure Of Spinach Major Light-harvesting
           Complex At 2.72 Angstrom Resolution
 pdb|1RWT|B Chain B, Crystal Structure Of Spinach Major Light-harvesting
           Complex At 2.72 Angstrom Resolution
 pdb|1RWT|C Chain C, Crystal Structure Of Spinach Major Light-harvesting
           Complex At 2.72 Angstrom Resolution
 pdb|1RWT|D Chain D, Crystal Structure Of Spinach Major Light-harvesting
           Complex At 2.72 Angstrom Resolution
 pdb|1RWT|E Chain E, Crystal Structure Of Spinach Major Light-harvesting
           Complex At 2.72 Angstrom Resolution
 pdb|1RWT|F Chain F, Crystal Structure Of Spinach Major Light-harvesting
           Complex At 2.72 Angstrom Resolution
 pdb|1RWT|G Chain G, Crystal Structure Of Spinach Major Light-harvesting
           Complex At 2.72 Angstrom Resolution
 pdb|1RWT|H Chain H, Crystal Structure Of Spinach Major Light-harvesting
           Complex At 2.72 Angstrom Resolution
 pdb|1RWT|I Chain I, Crystal Structure Of Spinach Major Light-harvesting
           Complex At 2.72 Angstrom Resolution
 pdb|1RWT|J Chain J, Crystal Structure Of Spinach Major Light-harvesting
           Complex At 2.72 Angstrom Resolution
          Length = 232

 Score =  159 bits (401), Expect = 1e-39,   Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
 Identities = 85/157 (54%), Positives = 107/157 (68%), Gaps = 6/157 (3%)

Query: 23  ELIHARWAMLGAAGFIIPEAFNKFGANCGPEAVWFKTGALLLDGNTLNYFGKN--IPINL 80
           E+IH RWAMLGA G + PE   + G   G EAVWFK G+ +     L+Y G    +    
Sbjct: 65  EVIHCRWAMLGALGCVFPELLARNGVKFG-EAVWFKAGSQIFSEGGLDYLGNPSLVHAQS 123

Query: 81  VFAVIA-EIVLVGGAEYYRITNGL--DLEDKLHPGGPFDPLGLAKDPDQFALLKVKEIKN 137
           + A+ A +++L+G  E YRI  G   ++ D L+PGG FDPLGLA DP+ FA LKVKEIKN
Sbjct: 124 ILAIWACQVILMGAVEGYRIAGGPLGEVVDPLYPGGSFDPLGLADDPEAFAELKVKEIKN 183

Query: 138 GRLAMFAMLGFFLQAYVTGEGPVENLAKHLSDPFANN 174
           GRLAMF+M GFF+QA VTG+GP+ENLA HL+DP  NN
Sbjct: 184 GRLAMFSMFGFFVQAIVTGKGPLENLADHLADPVNNN 220


>pdb|2WSC|1 Chain 1, Improved Model Of Plant Photosystem I
 pdb|2WSE|1 Chain 1, Improved Model Of Plant Photosystem I
 pdb|2WSF|1 Chain 1, Improved Model Of Plant Photosystem I
          Length = 241

 Score =  117 bits (293), Expect = 4e-27,   Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
 Identities = 69/164 (42%), Positives = 93/164 (56%), Gaps = 12/164 (7%)

Query: 19  YQAYELIHARWAMLGAAGFIIPEAFNKFGANCGPEAVWFKTGALL-LDGNTLNYFGKNIP 77
           Y+  ELIH RWAML   G ++PEA   +G        W K      L G    Y G  +P
Sbjct: 83  YKESELIHCRWAMLAVPGILVPEALG-YGN-------WVKAQEWAALPGGQATYLGNPVP 134

Query: 78  INLVFAVIA-EIVLVGGAEYYRITNGLDLEDKLHPGGPFDPLGLAKDPDQFALLKVKEIK 136
              +  ++A E + +   E+ R     D E K +PGG FDPLG +KDP +   LKVKEIK
Sbjct: 135 WGTLPTILAIEFLAIAFVEHQRSMEK-DPEKKKYPGGAFDPLGYSKDPKKLEELKVKEIK 193

Query: 137 NGRLAMFAMLGFFL-QAYVTGEGPVENLAKHLSDPFANNLLTVI 179
           NGRLA+ A +GF + Q+   G GP+ENLA HL+DP+ NN+  ++
Sbjct: 194 NGRLALLAFVGFCVQQSAYPGTGPLENLATHLADPWHNNIGDIV 237



 Score = 28.9 bits (63), Expect = 1.8,   Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
 Identities = 14/36 (38%), Positives = 19/36 (52%)

Query: 115 FDPLGLAKDPDQFALLKVKEIKNGRLAMFAMLGFFL 150
           FDPLGL + P      K  E+ + R AM A+ G  +
Sbjct: 68  FDPLGLGEVPANLERYKESELIHCRWAMLAVPGILV 103


>pdb|3PL9|A Chain A, Crystal Structure Of Spinach Minor Light-Harvesting
           Complex Cp29 At 2.80 Angstrom Resolution
          Length = 243

 Score =  117 bits (292), Expect = 6e-27,   Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
 Identities = 63/159 (39%), Positives = 93/159 (58%), Gaps = 12/159 (7%)

Query: 19  YQAYELIHARWAMLGAAGFIIPEAFNKFGANCGPEAVWFKTGAL-LLDGNTLNYFGKNIP 77
           ++  ELIH RWAML   G +  E              W   G + L++G++  Y G+ +P
Sbjct: 92  FRECELIHGRWAMLATLGALTVEGLTGI--------TWQDAGKVELIEGSS--YLGQPLP 141

Query: 78  INLVFAVIAEIVLVGGAEYYRITNGLDLEDKLHPGGPFDPLGLAKDPDQFALLKVKEIKN 137
            ++   +  E++++G  E+ R    LD E +L+PGG FDPLGLA DP++  +L++ EIK+
Sbjct: 142 FSMTTLIWIEVLVIGYIEFQRNAE-LDTEKRLYPGGTFDPLGLASDPEKKPILQLAEIKH 200

Query: 138 GRLAMFAMLGFFLQAYVTGEGPVENLAKHLSDPFANNLL 176
            RLAM   LGF +QA VTG+GP+ N   HLSDP    +L
Sbjct: 201 ARLAMVGFLGFAVQAAVTGKGPLNNWVTHLSDPLHTTIL 239


>pdb|2O01|1 Chain 1, The Structure Of A Plant Photosystem I Supercomplex At 3.4
           Angstrom Resolution
          Length = 187

 Score =  116 bits (290), Expect = 8e-27,   Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
 Identities = 69/160 (43%), Positives = 91/160 (56%), Gaps = 12/160 (7%)

Query: 19  YQAYELIHARWAMLGAAGFIIPEAFNKFGANCGPEAVWFKTGALL-LDGNTLNYFGKNIP 77
           Y+  ELIH RWAML   G ++PEA   +G        W K      L G    Y G  +P
Sbjct: 35  YKESELIHCRWAMLAVPGILVPEALG-YGN-------WVKAQEWAALPGGQATYLGNPVP 86

Query: 78  INLVFAVIA-EIVLVGGAEYYRITNGLDLEDKLHPGGPFDPLGLAKDPDQFALLKVKEIK 136
              +  ++A E + +   E+ R     D E K +PGG FDPLG +KDP +   LKVKEIK
Sbjct: 87  WGTLPTILAIEFLAIAFVEHQRSMEK-DPEKKKYPGGAFDPLGYSKDPKKLEELKVKEIK 145

Query: 137 NGRLAMFAMLGFFL-QAYVTGEGPVENLAKHLSDPFANNL 175
           NGRLA+ A +GF + Q+   G GP+ENLA HL+DP+ NN+
Sbjct: 146 NGRLALLAFVGFCVQQSAYPGTGPLENLATHLADPWHNNI 185



 Score = 28.5 bits (62), Expect = 2.4,   Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
 Identities = 14/36 (38%), Positives = 19/36 (52%)

Query: 115 FDPLGLAKDPDQFALLKVKEIKNGRLAMFAMLGFFL 150
           FDPLGL + P      K  E+ + R AM A+ G  +
Sbjct: 20  FDPLGLGEVPANLERYKESELIHCRWAMLAVPGILV 55


>pdb|2WSC|3 Chain 3, Improved Model Of Plant Photosystem I
 pdb|2WSE|3 Chain 3, Improved Model Of Plant Photosystem I
 pdb|2WSF|3 Chain 3, Improved Model Of Plant Photosystem I
          Length = 276

 Score =  112 bits (281), Expect = 9e-26,   Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
 Identities = 74/177 (41%), Positives = 99/177 (55%), Gaps = 26/177 (14%)

Query: 23  ELIHARWAMLGAAGFIIPEAFNKFGANCGPEAV-WFKTGALLLDGNTLNYFGKNIPINLV 81
           E+I+ R+AMLGA G I PE   K G      A+ WF+TG  +    T NY+  +  +   
Sbjct: 103 EIINGRYAMLGAVGAIAPEILGKAGLIPQETALPWFRTG-FIPPAGTYNYWADSYTL--- 158

Query: 82  FAVIAEIVLVGGAEYYRITNG-----------LDLEDKL-------HPGGPF-DPLGLAK 122
              + E+ L+G AE+ R  +            L LE  L       +PGGPF +PLG  K
Sbjct: 159 --FVFEMALMGFAEHRRFQDWAKPGSMGKQYFLGLEKGLGGSGEPAYPGGPFFNPLGFGK 216

Query: 123 DPDQFALLKVKEIKNGRLAMFAMLGFFLQAYVTGEGPVENLAKHLSDPFANNLLTVI 179
           D      LK+KE+KNGRLAM A+LG+F+QA VTG GP +NL  HL+DP  NN+LT +
Sbjct: 217 DEKSLKDLKLKEVKNGRLAMLAILGYFVQALVTGVGPYQNLLDHLTDPVHNNILTSL 273


>pdb|3LW5|1 Chain 1, Improved Model Of Plant Photosystem I
          Length = 170

 Score =  112 bits (279), Expect = 1e-25,   Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
 Identities = 67/156 (42%), Positives = 88/156 (56%), Gaps = 12/156 (7%)

Query: 19  YQAYELIHARWAMLGAAGFIIPEAFNKFGANCGPEAVWFKTGALL-LDGNTLNYFGKNIP 77
           Y+  ELIH RWAML   G ++PEA   +G        W K      L G    Y G  +P
Sbjct: 23  YKESELIHCRWAMLAVPGILVPEALG-YGN-------WVKAQEWAALPGGQATYLGNPVP 74

Query: 78  INLVFAVIA-EIVLVGGAEYYRITNGLDLEDKLHPGGPFDPLGLAKDPDQFALLKVKEIK 136
              +  ++A E + +   E+ R     D E K +PGG FDPLG +KDP +   LKVKEIK
Sbjct: 75  WGTLPTILAIEFLAIAFVEHQRSMEK-DPEKKKYPGGAFDPLGYSKDPKKLEELKVKEIK 133

Query: 137 NGRLAMFAMLGFFL-QAYVTGEGPVENLAKHLSDPF 171
           NGRLA+ A +GF + Q+   G GP+ENLA HL+DP+
Sbjct: 134 NGRLALLAFVGFCVQQSAYPGTGPLENLATHLADPW 169



 Score = 28.5 bits (62), Expect = 2.3,   Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
 Identities = 14/36 (38%), Positives = 19/36 (52%)

Query: 115 FDPLGLAKDPDQFALLKVKEIKNGRLAMFAMLGFFL 150
           FDPLGL + P      K  E+ + R AM A+ G  +
Sbjct: 8   FDPLGLGEVPANLERYKESELIHCRWAMLAVPGILV 43


>pdb|2O01|3 Chain 3, The Structure Of A Plant Photosystem I Supercomplex At 3.4
           Angstrom Resolution
          Length = 165

 Score =  100 bits (248), Expect = 7e-22,   Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
 Identities = 69/166 (41%), Positives = 92/166 (55%), Gaps = 26/166 (15%)

Query: 23  ELIHARWAMLGAAGFIIPEAFNKFGANCGPEAV-WFKTGALLLDGNTLNYFGKNIPINLV 81
           E+I+ R+AMLGAAG I PE   K G      A+ WF+TG +   G T  Y+  N  +   
Sbjct: 6   EIINGRFAMLGAAGAIAPEILGKAGLIPAETALPWFQTGVIPPAG-TYTYWADNYTL--- 61

Query: 82  FAVIAEIVLVGGAEYYRITNG-----------LDLEDKL-------HPGGPF-DPLGLAK 122
              + E+ L+G AE+ R+ +            L LE  L       +PGGPF +PLG  K
Sbjct: 62  --FVLEMALMGFAEHRRLQDWYNPGSMGKQYFLGLEKGLAGSGNPAYPGGPFFNPLGFGK 119

Query: 123 DPDQFALLKVKEIKNGRLAMFAMLGFFLQAYVTGEGPVENLAKHLS 168
           D      LK+KE+KNGRLAM A+LG+F+Q  VTG GP +NL  HL+
Sbjct: 120 DEKSLKELKLKEVKNGRLAMLAILGYFIQGLVTGVGPYQNLLDHLA 165


>pdb|3LW5|2 Chain 2, Improved Model Of Plant Photosystem I
          Length = 176

 Score = 96.3 bits (238), Expect = 9e-21,   Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
 Identities = 65/166 (39%), Positives = 81/166 (48%), Gaps = 32/166 (19%)

Query: 23  ELIHARWAMLGAAGFIIPEAFNKFGANCGPEAVWFKTGALLLDGNTLNYFGKNIPINLVF 82
           EL+H+RWAMLGAAG  IPE   K G    P   W+  G      +T   F          
Sbjct: 13  ELVHSRWAMLGAAGIFIPEFLTKLGILNTPS--WYTAGEQEYFTDTTTLF---------- 60

Query: 83  AVIAEIVLVGGAEYYRI----------------TNGLDLEDKLHPGG-PFDPLGL-AKDP 124
             I E+V +G AE  R                  N L   D  +PGG  FDPLG  +  P
Sbjct: 61  --IVELVFIGWAEGRRWADILNPGCVNTDPIFPNNKLTGTDVGYPGGLWFDPLGWGSASP 118

Query: 125 DQFALLKVKEIKNGRLAMFAMLGFFLQAYVTGEGPVENLAKHLSDP 170
            +   L+ KEIKNGRLAM A++G + Q   TG GP++NL  HL+DP
Sbjct: 119 QKLKELRTKEIKNGRLAMLAVMGAWFQHIYTGTGPIDNLFAHLADP 164


>pdb|2WSC|2 Chain 2, Improved Model Of Plant Photosystem I
 pdb|2WSE|2 Chain 2, Improved Model Of Plant Photosystem I
 pdb|2WSF|2 Chain 2, Improved Model Of Plant Photosystem I
          Length = 269

 Score = 95.5 bits (236), Expect = 1e-20,   Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
 Identities = 67/170 (39%), Positives = 83/170 (48%), Gaps = 33/170 (19%)

Query: 23  ELIHARWAMLGAAGFIIPEAFNKFGANCGPEAVWFKTGALLLDGNTLNYFGKNIPINLVF 82
           EL+H+RWAMLGAAG  IPE   K G    P   W+  G      +T   F          
Sbjct: 106 ELVHSRWAMLGAAGIFIPEFLTKLGILNTPS--WYTAGEQEYFTDTTTLF---------- 153

Query: 83  AVIAEIVLVGGAEYYRI----------------TNGLDLEDKLHPGG-PFDPLGL-AKDP 124
             I E+V +G AE  R                  N L   D  +PGG  FDPLG  +  P
Sbjct: 154 --IVELVFIGWAEGRRWADILNPGCVNTDPIFPNNKLTGTDVGYPGGLWFDPLGWGSASP 211

Query: 125 DQFALLKVKEIKNGRLAMFAMLGFFLQAYVTGEGPVENL-AKHLSDPFAN 173
            +   L+ KEIKNGRLAM A++G + Q   TG GP++NL A HL+DP A 
Sbjct: 212 QKLKELRTKEIKNGRLAMLAVMGAWFQHIYTGTGPIDNLFAAHLADPHAT 261



 Score = 34.3 bits (77), Expect = 0.040,   Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
 Identities = 16/44 (36%), Positives = 22/44 (50%)

Query: 115 FDPLGLAKDPDQFALLKVKEIKNGRLAMFAMLGFFLQAYVTGEG 158
           FDPLGL  DP+        E+ + R AM    G F+  ++T  G
Sbjct: 87  FDPLGLGSDPESLRWNVQAELVHSRWAMLGAAGIFIPEFLTKLG 130


>pdb|2O01|2 Chain 2, The Structure Of A Plant Photosystem I Supercomplex At 3.4
           Angstrom Resolution
          Length = 186

 Score = 95.1 bits (235), Expect = 2e-20,   Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
 Identities = 65/166 (39%), Positives = 81/166 (48%), Gaps = 32/166 (19%)

Query: 23  ELIHARWAMLGAAGFIIPEAFNKFGANCGPEAVWFKTGALLLDGNTLNYFGKNIPINLVF 82
           EL+H+RWAMLGAAG  IPE   K G    P   W+  G      +T   F          
Sbjct: 33  ELVHSRWAMLGAAGIFIPEFLTKLGILNTPS--WYTAGEQEYFTDTTTLF---------- 80

Query: 83  AVIAEIVLVGGAEYYRI----------------TNGLDLEDKLHPGG-PFDPLGL-AKDP 124
             I E+V +G AE  R                  N L   D  +PGG  FDPLG  +  P
Sbjct: 81  --IVELVFIGWAEGRRWADILNPGCVNTDPIFPNNKLTGTDVGYPGGLWFDPLGWGSASP 138

Query: 125 DQFALLKVKEIKNGRLAMFAMLGFFLQAYVTGEGPVENLAKHLSDP 170
            +   L+ KEIKNGRLAM A++G + Q   TG GP++NL  HL+DP
Sbjct: 139 QKLKELRTKEIKNGRLAMLAVMGAWFQHIYTGTGPIDNLFAHLADP 184



 Score = 34.7 bits (78), Expect = 0.035,   Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
 Identities = 15/41 (36%), Positives = 22/41 (53%)

Query: 115 FDPLGLAKDPDQFALLKVKEIKNGRLAMFAMLGFFLQAYVT 155
           FDPLGL+ DP+        E+ + R AM    G F+  ++T
Sbjct: 14  FDPLGLSSDPESLRWNVQAELVHSRWAMLGAAGIFIPEFLT 54


>pdb|3LW5|3 Chain 3, Improved Model Of Plant Photosystem I
          Length = 172

 Score = 91.7 bits (226), Expect = 2e-19,   Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
 Identities = 65/160 (40%), Positives = 86/160 (53%), Gaps = 26/160 (16%)

Query: 23  ELIHARWAMLGAAGFIIPEAFNKFGANCGPEAV-WFKTGALLLDGNTLNYFGKNIPINLV 81
           E+I+ R+AMLGA G I PE   K G      A+ WF+TG +   G T NY+  N  +   
Sbjct: 19  EVINGRFAMLGAVGAIAPEYLGKVGLIPQETALAWFQTGVIPPAG-TYNYWADNYTL--- 74

Query: 82  FAVIAEIVLVGGAEYYRITNG-----------LDLEDKL-------HPGGPF-DPLGLAK 122
              + E+ L+G AE+ R  +            L LE          +PGGPF +PLG  K
Sbjct: 75  --FVLEMALMGFAEHRRFQDWAKPGSMGKQYFLGLEKGFGGSGNPAYPGGPFFNPLGFGK 132

Query: 123 DPDQFALLKVKEIKNGRLAMFAMLGFFLQAYVTGEGPVEN 162
           D      LK+KE+KNGRLAM A+LG+F+Q  VTG GP +N
Sbjct: 133 DEKSLKELKLKEVKNGRLAMLAILGYFIQGLVTGVGPYQN 172


>pdb|2O01|4 Chain 4, The Structure Of A Plant Photosystem I Supercomplex At 3.4
           Angstrom Resolution
          Length = 165

 Score = 86.7 bits (213), Expect = 7e-18,   Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
 Identities = 58/170 (34%), Positives = 87/170 (51%), Gaps = 28/170 (16%)

Query: 23  ELIHARWAMLGAAGFIIPEAFNKFGANCGPEAVWFKTGALLLDGNTLNYFGKNIPINLVF 82
           EL++ RWAMLG AG ++PE F   G    P+  W+  G          YF  +  + ++ 
Sbjct: 11  ELVNGRWAMLGVAGMLLPEVFTSIGIINVPK--WYAAG-------KEEYFASSSTLFVIE 61

Query: 83  AVIAEIVLVGGAEYYRITN-GLDLEDKL------------HPGGPFDPLGLAKDPDQFAL 129
            +++  V +    +  I N G   +D +            +PGG F+PL  A   +    
Sbjct: 62  FILSHYVEI--RRWQDIKNPGSVNQDPIFKQYSLPAGEVGYPGGIFNPLNFAPTLEA--- 116

Query: 130 LKVKEIKNGRLAMFAMLGFFLQAYVTGEGPVENLAKHLSDPFANNLLTVI 179
            K KEI NGRLAM A LGF +Q  VTG+GP +NL +H+SDP+ N ++  +
Sbjct: 117 -KEKEIANGRLAMLAFLGFIIQHNVTGKGPFDNLLQHISDPWHNTIVQTL 165


>pdb|2WSC|4 Chain 4, Improved Model Of Plant Photosystem I
 pdb|2WSE|4 Chain 4, Improved Model Of Plant Photosystem I
 pdb|2WSF|4 Chain 4, Improved Model Of Plant Photosystem I
          Length = 251

 Score = 84.0 bits (206), Expect = 5e-17,   Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
 Identities = 59/173 (34%), Positives = 88/173 (50%), Gaps = 29/173 (16%)

Query: 23  ELIHARWAMLGAAGFIIPEAFNKFGANCGPEAVWFKTGALLLDGNTLNYFGKNIPINLVF 82
           EL++ RWAMLG AG ++PE F   G    P+  W+  G          YF  +  + ++ 
Sbjct: 95  ELVNGRWAMLGVAGMLLPEVFTSIGIINVPK--WYAAG-------KEEYFASSSTLFVIE 145

Query: 83  AVIAEIVLVGGAEYYRITN-GLDLEDKL------------HPGGPFDPLGLAKDPDQFAL 129
            +++  V +    +  I N G   +D +            +PGG F+PL  A   +    
Sbjct: 146 FILSHYVEI--RRWQDIKNPGSVNQDPIFKQYSLPAGEVGYPGGIFNPLNFAPTLEA--- 200

Query: 130 LKVKEIKNGRLAMFAMLGFFLQAYVTGEGPVENLAKHLSDPFANNLLTVISGN 182
            K KEI NGRL M A LGF +Q  VTG+GP +NL +H+SDP+ N ++  + GN
Sbjct: 201 -KEKEIANGRL-MLAFLGFIIQHNVTGKGPFDNLLQHISDPWHNTIVQTLGGN 251



 Score = 38.9 bits (89), Expect = 0.002,   Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
 Identities = 19/44 (43%), Positives = 23/44 (52%)

Query: 115 FDPLGLAKDPDQFALLKVKEIKNGRLAMFAMLGFFLQAYVTGEG 158
           FDPLGLA+DP+        E+ NGR AM  + G  L    T  G
Sbjct: 76  FDPLGLAEDPENLRWFVQAELVNGRWAMLGVAGMLLPEVFTSIG 119


>pdb|3LW5|4 Chain 4, Improved Model Of Plant Photosystem I
          Length = 166

 Score = 79.7 bits (195), Expect = 8e-16,   Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
 Identities = 57/167 (34%), Positives = 85/167 (50%), Gaps = 29/167 (17%)

Query: 23  ELIHARWAMLGAAGFIIPEAFNKFGANCGPEAVWFKTGALLLDGNTLNYFGKNIPINLVF 82
           EL++ RWAMLG AG ++PE F   G    P+  W+  G          YF  +  + ++ 
Sbjct: 15  ELVNGRWAMLGVAGMLLPEVFTSIGIINVPK--WYAAG-------KEEYFASSSTLFVIE 65

Query: 83  AVIAEIVLVGGAEYYRITN-GLDLEDKL------------HPGGPFDPLGLAKDPDQFAL 129
            +++  V +    +  I N G   +D +            +PGG F+PL  A   +    
Sbjct: 66  FILSHYVEI--RRWQDIKNPGSVNQDPIFKQYSLPAGEVGYPGGIFNPLNFAPTLEA--- 120

Query: 130 LKVKEIKNGRLAMFAMLGFFLQAYVTGEGPVENLAKHLSDPFANNLL 176
            K KEI NGRL M A LGF +Q  VTG+GP +NL +H+SDP+ N ++
Sbjct: 121 -KEKEIANGRL-MLAFLGFIIQHNVTGKGPFDNLLQHISDPWHNTIV 165



 Score = 27.7 bits (60), Expect = 3.9,   Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
 Identities = 14/39 (35%), Positives = 18/39 (46%)

Query: 120 LAKDPDQFALLKVKEIKNGRLAMFAMLGFFLQAYVTGEG 158
           LA+DP+        E+ NGR AM  + G  L    T  G
Sbjct: 1   LAEDPENLRWFVQAELVNGRWAMLGVAGMLLPEVFTSIG 39


>pdb|1YUE|A Chain A, Bacteriophage T4 Capsid Vertex Protein Gp24
          Length = 427

 Score = 26.6 bits (57), Expect = 9.3,   Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
 Identities = 16/47 (34%), Positives = 22/47 (46%), Gaps = 4/47 (8%)

Query: 71  YFGKNIPINLVFAVIAEIV----LVGGAEYYRITNGLDLEDKLHPGG 113
           Y   N P++ V   + E +    +VG   Y   T GLDL+D  H G 
Sbjct: 313 YCDTNSPLDYVIVGVVENIGEKEIVGSIFYAPYTEGLDLDDPEHVGA 359


  Database: pdbaa
    Posted date:  Mar 3, 2013 10:34 PM
  Number of letters in database: 14,973,337
  Number of sequences in database:  62,578
  
Lambda     K      H
   0.322    0.140    0.419 

Lambda     K      H
   0.267   0.0410    0.140 


Matrix: BLOSUM62
Gap Penalties: Existence: 11, Extension: 1
Number of Hits to DB: 6,163,907
Number of Sequences: 62578
Number of extensions: 271538
Number of successful extensions: 493
Number of sequences better than 100.0: 19
Number of HSP's better than 100.0 without gapping: 18
Number of HSP's successfully gapped in prelim test: 1
Number of HSP's that attempted gapping in prelim test: 438
Number of HSP's gapped (non-prelim): 31
length of query: 189
length of database: 14,973,337
effective HSP length: 93
effective length of query: 96
effective length of database: 9,153,583
effective search space: 878743968
effective search space used: 878743968
T: 11
A: 40
X1: 16 ( 7.4 bits)
X2: 38 (14.6 bits)
X3: 64 (24.7 bits)
S1: 41 (21.9 bits)
S2: 48 (23.1 bits)