BLASTP 2.2.26 [Sep-21-2011]
Reference: Altschul, Stephen F., Thomas L. Madden, Alejandro A. Schaffer,
Jinghui Zhang, Zheng Zhang, Webb Miller, and David J. Lipman (1997),
"Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search
programs", Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3389-3402.
Reference for compositional score matrix adjustment: Altschul, Stephen F.,
John C. Wootton, E. Michael Gertz, Richa Agarwala, Aleksandr Morgulis,
Alejandro A. Schaffer, and Yi-Kuo Yu (2005) "Protein database searches
using compositionally adjusted substitution matrices", FEBS J. 272:5101-5109.
Query= psy15323
(139 letters)
Database: pdbaa
62,578 sequences; 14,973,337 total letters
Searching..................................................done
>pdb|4HC7|A Chain A, Crystal Structure Of The Full Dna Binding Domain Of
Gata3-Complex 2
pdb|4HC7|B Chain B, Crystal Structure Of The Full Dna Binding Domain Of
Gata3-Complex 2
pdb|4HC9|A Chain A, Dna Binding By Gata Transcription Factor-Complex 3
pdb|4HCA|A Chain A, Dna Binding By Gata Transcription Factor-Complex 1
Length = 115
Score = 179 bits (454), Expect = 5e-46, Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
Identities = 86/118 (72%), Positives = 94/118 (79%), Gaps = 10/118 (8%)
Query: 8 GRECVNCGAISTPLWRRDGTGHYLCNACGLYHKMNGMNRPLVKPSKRLTATRRLGLCCTN 67
GRECVNCGA STPLWRRDGTGHYLCNACGLYHKMNG NRPL+KP +RL+A RR G C N
Sbjct: 5 GRECVNCGATSTPLWRRDGTGHYLCNACGLYHKMNGQNRPLIKPKRRLSAARRAGTSCAN 64
Query: 68 CGTRMTTLWRRNNDGEPVCNACGLYYKLHNVNRPLAMRHLAMRPLAMRKDGIQTRKRK 125
C T TTLWRRN +G+PVCNACGLYYKLHN+N RPL M+K+GIQTR RK
Sbjct: 65 CQTTTTTLWRRNANGDPVCNACGLYYKLHNIN----------RPLTMKKEGIQTRNRK 112
>pdb|3VD6|C Chain C, Both Zn Fingers Of Gata1 Bound To Palindromic Dna
Recognition Site, P21 Crystal Form
pdb|3VEK|C Chain C, Both Zn Fingers Of Gata1 Bound To Palindromic Dna
Recognition Site, P1 Crystal Form
pdb|3VEK|F Chain F, Both Zn Fingers Of Gata1 Bound To Palindromic Dna
Recognition Site, P1 Crystal Form
Length = 119
Score = 156 bits (394), Expect = 4e-39, Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
Identities = 83/119 (69%), Positives = 91/119 (76%), Gaps = 10/119 (8%)
Query: 7 EGRECVNCGAISTPLWRRDGTGHYLCNACGLYHKMNGMNRPLVKPSKRLTATRRLGLCCT 66
E RECVNCGA +TPLWRRD TGHYLCNACGLYHKMNG NRPL++P KR+ ++R G CT
Sbjct: 1 EARECVNCGATATPLWRRDRTGHYLCNACGLYHKMNGQNRPLIRPKKRMIVSKRAGTQCT 60
Query: 67 NCGTRMTTLWRRNNDGEPVCNACGLYYKLHNVNRPLAMRHLAMRPLAMRKDGIQTRKRK 125
NC T TTLWRRN G+PVCNACGLY+KLH VN RPL MRKDGIQTR RK
Sbjct: 61 NCQTTTTTLWRRNASGDPVCNACGLYFKLHQVN----------RPLTMRKDGIQTRNRK 109
>pdb|3DFV|D Chain D, Adjacent Gata Dna Binding
pdb|3DFV|C Chain C, Adjacent Gata Dna Binding
pdb|3DFX|A Chain A, Opposite Gata Dna Binding
pdb|3DFX|B Chain B, Opposite Gata Dna Binding
Length = 63
Score = 87.8 bits (216), Expect = 2e-18, Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
Identities = 43/70 (61%), Positives = 49/70 (70%), Gaps = 10/70 (14%)
Query: 56 TATRRLGLCCTNCGTRMTTLWRRNNDGEPVCNACGLYYKLHNVNRPLAMRHLAMRPLAMR 115
+A RR G C NC T TTLWRRN +G+PVCNACGLYYKLHN+N RPL M+
Sbjct: 1 SAARRAGTSCANCQTTTTTLWRRNANGDPVCNACGLYYKLHNIN----------RPLTMK 50
Query: 116 KDGIQTRKRK 125
K+GIQTR RK
Sbjct: 51 KEGIQTRNRK 60
Score = 55.1 bits (131), Expect = 1e-08, Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
Identities = 22/42 (52%), Positives = 29/42 (69%)
Query: 8 GRECVNCGAISTPLWRRDGTGHYLCNACGLYHKMNGMNRPLV 49
G C NC +T LWRR+ G +CNACGLY+K++ +NRPL
Sbjct: 7 GTSCANCQTTTTTLWRRNANGDPVCNACGLYYKLHNINRPLT 48
>pdb|1Y0J|A Chain A, Zinc Fingers As Protein Recognition Motifs: Structural
Basis For The Gata-1FRIEND OF GATA INTERACTION
Length = 46
Score = 85.1 bits (209), Expect = 1e-17, Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
Identities = 37/44 (84%), Positives = 40/44 (90%)
Query: 7 EGRECVNCGAISTPLWRRDGTGHYLCNACGLYHKMNGMNRPLVK 50
E RECVNCGA +TPLWRRD TGHYLCNACGLYHKMNG NRPL++
Sbjct: 3 EARECVNCGATATPLWRRDRTGHYLCNACGLYHKMNGQNRPLIR 46
Score = 50.8 bits (120), Expect = 2e-07, Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
Identities = 22/38 (57%), Positives = 27/38 (71%)
Query: 65 CTNCGTRMTTLWRRNNDGEPVCNACGLYYKLHNVNRPL 102
C NCG T LWRR+ G +CNACGLY+K++ NRPL
Sbjct: 7 CVNCGATATPLWRRDRTGHYLCNACGLYHKMNGQNRPL 44
>pdb|1GNF|A Chain A, Solution Structure Of The N-Terminal Zinc Finger Of
Murine Gata-1, Nmr, 25 Structures
Length = 46
Score = 84.3 bits (207), Expect = 2e-17, Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
Identities = 37/43 (86%), Positives = 39/43 (90%)
Query: 7 EGRECVNCGAISTPLWRRDGTGHYLCNACGLYHKMNGMNRPLV 49
E RECVNCGA +TPLWRRD TGHYLCNACGLYHKMNG NRPL+
Sbjct: 3 EARECVNCGATATPLWRRDRTGHYLCNACGLYHKMNGQNRPLI 45
Score = 50.8 bits (120), Expect = 2e-07, Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
Identities = 22/38 (57%), Positives = 27/38 (71%)
Query: 65 CTNCGTRMTTLWRRNNDGEPVCNACGLYYKLHNVNRPL 102
C NCG T LWRR+ G +CNACGLY+K++ NRPL
Sbjct: 7 CVNCGATATPLWRRDRTGHYLCNACGLYHKMNGQNRPL 44
>pdb|1GAT|A Chain A, Solution Structure Of The Specific Dna Complex Of The Zinc
Containing Dna Binding Domain Of The Erythroid
Transcription Factor Gata-1 By Multidimensional Nmr
pdb|1GAU|A Chain A, Solution Structure Of The Specific Dna Complex Of The Zinc
Containing Dna Binding Domain Of The Erythroid
Transcription Factor Gata-1 By Multidimensional Nmr
Length = 60
Score = 82.8 bits (203), Expect = 6e-17, Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
Identities = 42/67 (62%), Positives = 46/67 (68%), Gaps = 10/67 (14%)
Query: 59 RRLGLCCTNCGTRMTTLWRRNNDGEPVCNACGLYYKLHNVNRPLAMRHLAMRPLAMRKDG 118
+R G C+NC T TTLWRR+ G+PVCNACGLYYKLH VN RPL MRKDG
Sbjct: 1 KRAGTVCSNCQTSTTTLWRRSPMGDPVCNACGLYYKLHQVN----------RPLTMRKDG 50
Query: 119 IQTRKRK 125
IQTR RK
Sbjct: 51 IQTRNRK 57
Score = 50.8 bits (120), Expect = 3e-07, Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
Identities = 22/42 (52%), Positives = 28/42 (66%)
Query: 8 GRECVNCGAISTPLWRRDGTGHYLCNACGLYHKMNGMNRPLV 49
G C NC +T LWRR G +CNACGLY+K++ +NRPL
Sbjct: 4 GTVCSNCQTSTTTLWRRSPMGDPVCNACGLYYKLHQVNRPLT 45
>pdb|3GAT|A Chain A, Solution Nmr Structure Of The C-Terminal Domain Of Chicken
Gata-1 Bound To Dna, 34 Structures
pdb|2GAT|A Chain A, Solution Structure Of The C-Terminal Domain Of Chicken
Gata- 1 Bound To Dna, Nmr, Regularized Mean Structure
Length = 66
Score = 82.4 bits (202), Expect = 7e-17, Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
Identities = 42/67 (62%), Positives = 46/67 (68%), Gaps = 10/67 (14%)
Query: 59 RRLGLCCTNCGTRMTTLWRRNNDGEPVCNACGLYYKLHNVNRPLAMRHLAMRPLAMRKDG 118
+R G C+NC T TTLWRR+ G+PVCNACGLYYKLH VN RPL MRKDG
Sbjct: 1 KRAGTVCSNCQTSTTTLWRRSPMGDPVCNACGLYYKLHQVN----------RPLTMRKDG 50
Query: 119 IQTRKRK 125
IQTR RK
Sbjct: 51 IQTRNRK 57
Score = 50.8 bits (120), Expect = 2e-07, Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
Identities = 22/42 (52%), Positives = 28/42 (66%)
Query: 8 GRECVNCGAISTPLWRRDGTGHYLCNACGLYHKMNGMNRPLV 49
G C NC +T LWRR G +CNACGLY+K++ +NRPL
Sbjct: 4 GTVCSNCQTSTTTLWRRSPMGDPVCNACGLYYKLHQVNRPLT 45
>pdb|2L6Y|A Chain A, Haddock Model Of Gata1nf:lmo2lim2-Ldb1lid
pdb|2L6Z|A Chain A, Haddock Model Of Gata1nf:lmo2lim2-Ldb1lid With Fog
Length = 39
Score = 77.0 bits (188), Expect = 3e-15, Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
Identities = 34/39 (87%), Positives = 35/39 (89%)
Query: 7 EGRECVNCGAISTPLWRRDGTGHYLCNACGLYHKMNGMN 45
E RECVNCGA +TPLWRRD TGHYLCNACGLYHKMNG N
Sbjct: 1 EARECVNCGATATPLWRRDRTGHYLCNACGLYHKMNGQN 39
Score = 44.3 bits (103), Expect = 2e-05, Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
Identities = 19/35 (54%), Positives = 24/35 (68%)
Query: 65 CTNCGTRMTTLWRRNNDGEPVCNACGLYYKLHNVN 99
C NCG T LWRR+ G +CNACGLY+K++ N
Sbjct: 5 CVNCGATATPLWRRDRTGHYLCNACGLYHKMNGQN 39
>pdb|4GAT|A Chain A, Solution Nmr Structure Of The Wild Type Dna Binding Domain
Of Area Complexed To A 13bp Dna Containing A Cgata Site,
Regularized Mean Structure
pdb|5GAT|A Chain A, Solution Nmr Structure Of The Wild Type Dna Binding Domain
Of Area Complexed To A 13bp Dna Containing A Cgata Site,
35 Structures
Length = 66
Score = 62.8 bits (151), Expect = 5e-11, Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
Identities = 30/60 (50%), Positives = 40/60 (66%), Gaps = 10/60 (16%)
Query: 65 CTNCGTRMTTLWRRNNDGEPVCNACGLYYKLHNVNRPLAMRHLAMRPLAMRKDGIQTRKR 124
CTNC T+ T LWRRN +G+P+CNACGL+ KLH V +RPL+++ D I+ R R
Sbjct: 12 CTNCFTQTTPLWRRNPEGQPLCNACGLFLKLHGV----------VRPLSLKTDVIKKRNR 61
Score = 51.6 bits (122), Expect = 1e-07, Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
Identities = 22/38 (57%), Positives = 28/38 (73%)
Query: 11 CVNCGAISTPLWRRDGTGHYLCNACGLYHKMNGMNRPL 48
C NC +TPLWRR+ G LCNACGL+ K++G+ RPL
Sbjct: 12 CTNCFTQTTPLWRRNPEGQPLCNACGLFLKLHGVVRPL 49
>pdb|2VUS|I Chain I, Crystal Structure Of Unliganded Nmra-Area Zinc Finger
Complex
pdb|2VUS|J Chain J, Crystal Structure Of Unliganded Nmra-Area Zinc Finger
Complex
pdb|2VUS|K Chain K, Crystal Structure Of Unliganded Nmra-Area Zinc Finger
Complex
pdb|2VUS|L Chain L, Crystal Structure Of Unliganded Nmra-Area Zinc Finger
Complex
pdb|2VUS|M Chain M, Crystal Structure Of Unliganded Nmra-Area Zinc Finger
Complex
pdb|2VUS|N Chain N, Crystal Structure Of Unliganded Nmra-Area Zinc Finger
Complex
pdb|2VUS|O Chain O, Crystal Structure Of Unliganded Nmra-Area Zinc Finger
Complex
pdb|2VUS|P Chain P, Crystal Structure Of Unliganded Nmra-Area Zinc Finger
Complex
pdb|2VUT|I Chain I, Crystal Structure Of Nad-Bound Nmra-Area Zinc Finger
Complex
pdb|2VUT|J Chain J, Crystal Structure Of Nad-Bound Nmra-Area Zinc Finger
Complex
pdb|2VUT|K Chain K, Crystal Structure Of Nad-Bound Nmra-Area Zinc Finger
Complex
pdb|2VUT|L Chain L, Crystal Structure Of Nad-Bound Nmra-Area Zinc Finger
Complex
pdb|2VUT|M Chain M, Crystal Structure Of Nad-Bound Nmra-Area Zinc Finger
Complex
pdb|2VUT|N Chain N, Crystal Structure Of Nad-Bound Nmra-Area Zinc Finger
Complex
pdb|2VUT|O Chain O, Crystal Structure Of Nad-Bound Nmra-Area Zinc Finger
Complex
pdb|2VUT|P Chain P, Crystal Structure Of Nad-Bound Nmra-Area Zinc Finger
Complex
pdb|2VUU|I Chain I, Crystal Structure Of Nadp-Bound Nmra-Area Zinc Finger
Complex
pdb|2VUU|J Chain J, Crystal Structure Of Nadp-Bound Nmra-Area Zinc Finger
Complex
pdb|2VUU|K Chain K, Crystal Structure Of Nadp-Bound Nmra-Area Zinc Finger
Complex
pdb|2VUU|L Chain L, Crystal Structure Of Nadp-Bound Nmra-Area Zinc Finger
Complex
pdb|2VUU|M Chain M, Crystal Structure Of Nadp-Bound Nmra-Area Zinc Finger
Complex
pdb|2VUU|N Chain N, Crystal Structure Of Nadp-Bound Nmra-Area Zinc Finger
Complex
pdb|2VUU|O Chain O, Crystal Structure Of Nadp-Bound Nmra-Area Zinc Finger
Complex
pdb|2VUU|P Chain P, Crystal Structure Of Nadp-Bound Nmra-Area Zinc Finger
Complex
Length = 43
Score = 62.0 bits (149), Expect = 1e-10, Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
Identities = 26/40 (65%), Positives = 33/40 (82%)
Query: 65 CTNCGTRMTTLWRRNNDGEPVCNACGLYYKLHNVNRPLAM 104
CTNC T+ T LWRRN +G+P+CNACGL+ KLH V RPL++
Sbjct: 4 CTNCFTQTTPLWRRNPEGQPLCNACGLFLKLHGVVRPLSL 43
Score = 51.2 bits (121), Expect = 2e-07, Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
Identities = 22/38 (57%), Positives = 28/38 (73%)
Query: 11 CVNCGAISTPLWRRDGTGHYLCNACGLYHKMNGMNRPL 48
C NC +TPLWRR+ G LCNACGL+ K++G+ RPL
Sbjct: 4 CTNCFTQTTPLWRRNPEGQPLCNACGLFLKLHGVVRPL 41
>pdb|7GAT|A Chain A, Solution Nmr Structure Of The L22v Mutant Dna Binding
Domain Of Area Complexed To A 13 Bp Dna Containing A
Tgata Site, 34 Structures
pdb|6GAT|A Chain A, Solution Nmr Structure Of The L22v Mutant Dna Binding
Domain Of Area Complexed To A 13 Bp Dna Containing A
Tgata Site, Regularized Mean Structure
Length = 66
Score = 62.0 bits (149), Expect = 1e-10, Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
Identities = 29/60 (48%), Positives = 40/60 (66%), Gaps = 10/60 (16%)
Query: 65 CTNCGTRMTTLWRRNNDGEPVCNACGLYYKLHNVNRPLAMRHLAMRPLAMRKDGIQTRKR 124
CTNC T+ T +WRRN +G+P+CNACGL+ KLH V +RPL+++ D I+ R R
Sbjct: 12 CTNCFTQTTPVWRRNPEGQPLCNACGLFLKLHGV----------VRPLSLKTDVIKKRNR 61
Score = 50.8 bits (120), Expect = 3e-07, Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
Identities = 21/38 (55%), Positives = 28/38 (73%)
Query: 11 CVNCGAISTPLWRRDGTGHYLCNACGLYHKMNGMNRPL 48
C NC +TP+WRR+ G LCNACGL+ K++G+ RPL
Sbjct: 12 CTNCFTQTTPVWRRNPEGQPLCNACGLFLKLHGVVRPL 49
>pdb|2KAE|A Chain A, Data-Driven Model Of Med1:dna Complex
Length = 71
Score = 33.9 bits (76), Expect = 0.028, Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
Identities = 18/54 (33%), Positives = 28/54 (51%), Gaps = 2/54 (3%)
Query: 65 CTNCGTRMTTLWRRNNDGEPV-CNACGLYYKLHNVNRPL-AMRHLAMRPLAMRK 116
C+NC T WR E + CNAC +Y + +N RP+ A+ R L +++
Sbjct: 11 CSNCSVTETIRWRNIRSKEGIQCNACFIYQRKYNKTRPVTAVNKYQKRKLKVQE 64
Score = 29.6 bits (65), Expect = 0.50, Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
Identities = 16/46 (34%), Positives = 21/46 (45%), Gaps = 3/46 (6%)
Query: 10 ECVNCGAISTPLWR--RDGTGHYLCNACGLYHKMNGMNRPLVKPSK 53
+C NC T WR R G CNAC +Y + RP+ +K
Sbjct: 10 QCSNCSVTETIRWRNIRSKEG-IQCNACFIYQRKYNKTRPVTAVNK 54
>pdb|3SUB|A Chain A, Crystal Structure Of The Catalytic Domain Of Plasmodium
Falciparum Arf Gtpase Activating Protein
pdb|3SUB|B Chain B, Crystal Structure Of The Catalytic Domain Of Plasmodium
Falciparum Arf Gtpase Activating Protein
Length = 163
Score = 28.5 bits (62), Expect = 1.4, Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
Identities = 15/44 (34%), Positives = 23/44 (52%), Gaps = 1/44 (2%)
Query: 10 ECVNCGAISTPLWRRDGTGHYLCNACGLYHKMNGMNRPLVKPSK 53
+C +CG IS P W G +LC C H+ G++ +V+ K
Sbjct: 24 KCFDCG-ISNPDWVSVNHGIFLCINCSGVHRSLGVHISIVRSIK 66
>pdb|2P57|A Chain A, Gap Domain Of Znf289, An Id1-Regulated Zinc Finger
Protein
Length = 144
Score = 27.3 bits (59), Expect = 2.9, Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
Identities = 12/45 (26%), Positives = 22/45 (48%), Gaps = 1/45 (2%)
Query: 9 RECVNCGAISTPLWRRDGTGHYLCNACGLYHKMNGMNRPLVKPSK 53
+ C +CGA P W G +LC C H+ G++ ++ ++
Sbjct: 38 KACFDCGA-KNPSWASITYGVFLCIDCSGVHRSLGVHLSFIRSTE 81
>pdb|2CRW|A Chain A, Solution Structure Of The Arfgap Domain Of
Adp-Ribosylation Factor Gtpaseactivating Protein 3
(Arfgap 3)
Length = 149
Score = 26.6 bits (57), Expect = 4.7, Method: Compositional matrix adjust.
Identities = 15/61 (24%), Positives = 26/61 (42%), Gaps = 1/61 (1%)
Query: 9 RECVNCGAISTPLWRRDGTGHYLCNACGLYHKMNGMNRPLVKPSKRLTATRRLGLCCTNC 68
+ C +CGA P W G +LC C H+ G++ ++ ++ + L C
Sbjct: 30 KVCFDCGA-KNPSWASITYGVFLCIDCSGSHRSLGVHLSFIRSTELDSNWSWFQLRCMQV 88
Query: 69 G 69
G
Sbjct: 89 G 89
Database: pdbaa
Posted date: Mar 3, 2013 10:34 PM
Number of letters in database: 14,973,337
Number of sequences in database: 62,578
Lambda K H
0.326 0.139 0.472
Lambda K H
0.267 0.0410 0.140
Matrix: BLOSUM62
Gap Penalties: Existence: 11, Extension: 1
Number of Hits to DB: 4,121,392
Number of Sequences: 62578
Number of extensions: 153764
Number of successful extensions: 367
Number of sequences better than 100.0: 15
Number of HSP's better than 100.0 without gapping: 11
Number of HSP's successfully gapped in prelim test: 4
Number of HSP's that attempted gapping in prelim test: 336
Number of HSP's gapped (non-prelim): 26
length of query: 139
length of database: 14,973,337
effective HSP length: 89
effective length of query: 50
effective length of database: 9,403,895
effective search space: 470194750
effective search space used: 470194750
T: 11
A: 40
X1: 15 ( 7.0 bits)
X2: 38 (14.6 bits)
X3: 64 (24.7 bits)
S1: 40 (21.6 bits)
S2: 46 (22.3 bits)