CASP8

Targets
387 388 389 390
391 392 393 394
395 396 397 398
399 400 401 402
403 404 405 406
407 408 409 410
411 412 413 414
415 416 417 418
419 420 421 422
423 424 425 426
427 428 429 430
431 432 433 434
435 436 437 438
439 440 441 442
443 444 445 446
447 448 449 450
451 452 453 454
455 456 457 458
459 460 461 462
463 464 465 466
467 468 469 470
471 472 473 474
475 476 477 478
479 480 481 482
483 484 485 486
487 488 489 490
491 492 493 494
495 496 497 498
499 500 501 502
503 504 505 506
507 508 509 510
511 512 513 514

Analysis of CASP8 predictions

We evaluated 'Server only' predictions and 'Human/Server' predictions using three scores: TS, TR and CS. The results are presented as sortable tables (need JavaScript enabled). Superpositions of models with target structures can be visualized in PyMOL by clicking on a score (need PyMOL installed). Targets are evaluated as whole chains and domains and are grouped in 5 categories by prediction difficulty. Separate evaluation tables are provied for each category.

Server only
evaluation
Human/Server
evaluation

Evaluation web pages are non-intuitive, but loaded with action. READ THIS:

WARNING: evaluation tables are generated automatically and do not represent the final word in CASP8 assessment. For other automatic evaluations see Baker, Cheng, McGuffin, Zhang.

questions, comments, suggestions: shuoyong.shi@utsouthwestern.edu

get the list of target PDB codes; get target category assignment and domain definitions; get all evaluation tables in a text file
get renumbered and edited to match target sequences PDB coordinates; learn about 'random predictions'
read about NMR structures we processed, target categories we defined and scores we used; see the discussion of whole chain vs. domain evaluation

Target Categories in CASP8 First Score from First model only
CM_easy: Top 10 First-GTD_TS avg ≥ 81 Best Score from Best scoring model (up to 5)
CM_medium: Top 10 First-GDT_TS avg ≥ 67 Z-score Z-score computed on the target scores
CM_hard: Top 10 First-GDT_TS avg ≥ 52 TS GDT_TS score by LGA 1)
FR: Top 10 First-GDT_TS avg ≥ 30 TR GDT_TS score by LGA 1) minus penalty
FM: Top 10 First-GDT_TS avg < 30 CS Contact score based on intramolecular distances
All Targets: Everything combined SUM The sum of scores for all models

1) Zemla A. (2003) "LGA: A method for finding 3D similarities in protein structures." Nucleic Acids Research, 31(13):3370-3374; PMID: 12824330

To display structures with a mouse-click
                                       

Target category definition

                                                               
download PyMOL
!!!   NOW   !!!

Scores used in evaluation

Random model and random score

Discussion of whole chain vs. domain evaluations

Server only
evaluation
Human/Server
evaluation
Download: target seq | target str | domain def | evaluation scores