CASP9

Targets
515 516 517 518
519 520 521 522
523 524 525 526
527 528 529 530
531 532 533 534
535 536 537 538
539 540 541 542
543 544 545 546
547 548 549 550
551 552 553 554
555 556 557 558
559 560 561 562
563 564 565 566
567 568 569 570
571 572 573 574
575 576 577 578
579 580 581 582
583 584 585 586
587 588 589 590
591 592 593 594
595 596 597 598
599 600 601 602
603 604 605 606
607 608 609 610
611 612 613 614
615 616 617 618
619 620 621 622
623 624 625 626
627 628 629 630
631 632 633 634
635 636 637 638
639 640 641 642
643      

Analysis of CASP9 predictions

We evaluated FM targets using four scores: GDT, CS, TenS and QCS. The results are presented as sortable tables (need JavaScript enabled). Superpositions of models with target structures can be visualized in PyMOL by clicking on a score (need PyMOL installed).

FM targets evaluation
regular scores
FM targets evaluation
ratio of scores to top server model

questions, comments, suggestions: shuoyong.shi@utsouthwestern.edu

To display structures with a mouse-click
                                       

Target category definition

                                                               
download PyMOL
!!!   NOW   !!!

Scores used in evaluation

Random model and random score

Discussion of whole chain vs. domain evaluations

Download: target seq | target str | domain def | evaluation scores